tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2433945320549143329.post3616799749337143524..comments2023-09-13T10:53:12.598-05:00Comments on Tullius est [et Tullius non est Cicero]: Constitutional Right to Death and Poor Grammar in New MexicoAnonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15716893685688516529noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2433945320549143329.post-84737144940744791012014-02-28T16:06:06.344-06:002014-02-28T16:06:06.344-06:00Hardy har har.
BTW, I think did just "derive...Hardy har har.<br /><br />BTW, I think did just "derive" an ought from an is.<br />1. Tullius est.<br />2. Thus, necessarily, one shouldn't kill babies for fun.<br /><br />Since both 1 and 2 are true, and since a necessary truth follows from anything whatsoever, that's sound. So to get an is-ought problem you'll either have to adopt something other than classical logic or specify that the derivation in question is something other than logical entailment.Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15716893685688516529noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2433945320549143329.post-37089356757881419312014-02-27T19:37:38.781-06:002014-02-27T19:37:38.781-06:00Wow. I'll bet she thinks you can get an "...Wow. I'll bet she thinks you can get an "ought" from an "is" too. What a moron.<br /><br />:)Monashnoreply@blogger.com