If my dog would've lived another minute or two, I would have euthanized him. "Big Dread" (or The Clean Cut Artist Formerly Known as Big Dread) points out that there is a seeming conflict between thinking one can euthanize one's dog out of love and an argument I gave against annihilationism
here.
Whereas I see no
formal contradiction, Big Dread aptly points out a tension. If
euthanizing one's dog who is suffering can be a loving action, then why think that God's annihilating someone cannot also be an act of love?
Here is, then, an argument that annihilation can be a loving action:
1. Killing a dog is bringing about the dog's nonexistence.
2. Bringing about something's nonexistence is relevantly similar to annihilation such that there's no moral difference.
3. Loving is a moral action.
4. Killing a dog can be a loving action.
5. Thus, annihilating can be a loving action.
I accept 1. A dog cannot survive death except by resurrection. If a dog is resurrected it will have a "gappy" existence. I also accept 2 and 3. 4 is the questionable premise.
Can I love my dog by killing my dog?